One of the casualties of any sort of armed conflict in the world, is the exposure of other news, especially news that is damaging to the people who are in control.
With things happening in Ukraine, findings in the investigations into voter fraud in the 2020 general election have been essentially shelved for all except those who are following the story. Last week, the retired judge heading up the investigative efforts in Wisconsin reported bombshell findings, and barely anything penetrated at the mainstream media headline level.
Mr. Gableman vetted more than 90 nursing homes in five different counties before concluding there was “widespread election fraud at Wisconsin nursing homes in November of 2020.”
Mr. Gableman also found that $8.8 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. He wrote, “The record created by public document requests shows that CTCL, a private company headquartered in Chicago, engaged in an election bribery scheme.”
Zuckerberg’s CTCL grant money came with strings attached that created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican areas. Wisconsin’s five largest cities—Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay—were invited to take CTCL’s private money on the condition that they “increased in-person voting and absentee voting for targeted areas and groups”.
Special Counsel Gableman: Wisconsin Election Commission left a "trail of victims"
There are 92,000 nursing home residents in Wisconsin
"In the Zuckerberg 5 cities, in all of those counties those nursing homes reported a voting rate of 100%, anywhere in between 95% and 100%." pic.twitter.com/1rbNZVBM1H
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) March 1, 2022
These groups met particular demographic criteria which, Gableman wrote, “matched that of the Biden-voter profile”.
Zuckerberg’s grant money also hired “CTCL’s partners for election administration”. A New York lawyer and Democrat political operative, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein was listed as a “CTCL grant mentor” who directed election administration in Green Bay.
Mr. Rubenstein provided instructions to Central Count workers, developed absentee voting protocols, and set up a wireless network for Election Day operations in his Hyatt Regency hotel room.
The Special Counsel wrote, “At Mr. Spitzer Rubenstein’s instruction, there were three WiFi networks available. One was the general conference facility public network that would be available to members of the press and others. That network was password-protected, but the password was widely available. A second password-protected WiFi network was created for Central Count staff. Mr. Spitzer Rubenstein also directed that a third WiFi network be established, but that network was to be hidden and it was not to be password-protected. Spitzer Rubenstein also ensured that both networks reached his hotel room on the 8th floor.”
There is absolutely no way that such a scheme is acceptable or legal. Why this story is being ignored when it has the potential to balloon into a scandal of epic proportions is a mystery. Usually, media people look for scandals to provide headlines to get lots of clicks and sell more advertising. Apparently, voter fraud just is not of great interest to the gatekeepers of information.
Please make sure to share our website and articles with your friends, family, and fellow patriots to help us spread the truth!
Let us know your thoughts on this liberal progressive BS in the comment section…
568
432
4k
"I guess in my mind I thought if you put your parent in a facility because they were incapacitated, they would not be even offered the vote." pic.twitter.com/3R0KHFYG91
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) March 1, 2022
So…..make history and decertify the electors. Other states would follow.